Unemployment: A Symptom of Capitalism

It is an undeniable reality, accepted by anyone who pays the concept any amount of attention, that unemployment is an inherently negative thing. It perpetuates poverty, forces people to use the welfare system and puts certain parts of the younger generation at an inherent disadvantage. So then, why hasn’t this problem been solved?

The Causes of Unemployment

Why does unemployment exist? Is it lazy people, too stupid to get a job, as tabloids would love you to believe?

Of course not. Anyone who has ever tried to get a job knows that it is immensely difficult to find one, and that if you do, the terms of the job are so awful that it’s not worth going to it, often with mindless, repetitive labour for minimal pay on zero hours contracts.

The reason for unemployment is capitalism.

The capitalists, those who control employment and can assign jobs at their discretion, use unemployment as a tool of subordination and repression/ By having their reserve army of the unemployed, they can intimidate those who do have jobs – go on strike, demand a raise or do anything your boss doesn’t like and you can be replaced immediately by the 4.3% of the population who don’t have a job, and who are forced to live on a pitiful benefits allowance that can be as low as £50 a week.

This forms division among the masses as well. Those who do not have a job resent those who do, and those who do have a job hate the unemployed for being a threat to their job. Right wing media publications such as the Daily Mail and Telegraph love to capitalise on this, with regular articles about ‘benefit scroungers’ and ‘habitual slackers’, to whip up the hysteria of division among the working class; to distract the workers from their reals enemies – those who enforce this system of unemployment.

Young people are told that to get a job in today’s age is “a great opportunity”, something that you should be grateful for, for the wonderful benevolence of the corporate billionaire for allowing you to earn £5.50 an hour. Young people are some of the least represented in unions – only 2.9% of workers aged 16-20 are unionised – and so the capitalists are free to do with them as they please, underpaying and overworking young people in unsanitary and unsafe conditions.

How Unemployment can be Solved

How do we get rid of unemployment once and for all, how can we make sure that everyone who’s fit to work has a job that pays them fairly, that guarantees them workplace rights and that gives them a friendly community in the workplace?

Let us first get rid of any doubt: Capitalism can not, and will not, solve this problem for any period of time. Any reductions in unemployment rates under capitalism are only temporary. For the very reasons discussed above, it is simply against all interests of those who, like parasitic puppet masters, pull the strings of the system in all ways.

The masses cannot put their hopes in shallow reforms promised by such sycophants as the Labour Party, who promise long-lasting change but consistently fail to deliver. We must look to an altogether more radical solution.

There is only one system which could even possibly give a guaranteed future of full employment, which has full employment as one of its core and unchangeable principles,and which looks for the masses to rule themselves, as opposed to being represented and repressed by silver spoon millionaires who’ve never done a day’s work in their lives. That system is Socialism.

Socialists, through our understanding of the workings of society, consider employment not to be a mere privilege, bestowed upon those who suck upon the wretched boot of Capital in a humble enough manner, something to be rightfully restricted from the rabble of society, but a right, one which should be afforded to all who wish to accept it. We believe employment to be as much of an unalienable right as any other freedom. This belief of ours leads us to strive for, and succeed in, giving all people the opportunity for employment.

Real World Examples

The first example we will deal with is the UK, a nation strangled by the clutches of Capital, using their unemployment statistics for the last three years.

In January 2014, the UK’s percent unemployment was: 6.8%

In January 2017, the UK’s percent unemployment was: 5.5%

In January 2016, the UK’s percent unemployment was: 5.1%

While, granted, this is going down, that is following the worst recession since the Great Depression, so the magnitude must be placed in the context of that. It is also poignant to note that while this statistic may be low-ish now, the Capitalist unemployment rate is a fluctuating mess. For one quick example, The unemployment rate in the mid 1980s was as high as +12%!

Now, time to contrast that with the percent unemployment of the USSR, a nation which could, to a certain extent, boast a liberating Socialist system. Their unemployment, on average, after the development of Socialism, was only 1.5%. And this employment was in favour of the workers: prior to the October Revolution, the average working day in Russia was 11.5 hours, after it, it was 8 hours, and for higher pay.

Women were given equal rights to men, and active steps were taken to allow more women to enter the workforce, by providing free nurseries and daycares, community dining rooms and laundrettes, in order to free women from the domestic drudgery to which the patriarchal system of Tsarism had condemned them to. While women in the West were still fighting for basic human rights (marital rape wasn’t made illegal in Britain until 1991!) Soviet women were protected by the law and given absolute equality to men in all fields.

Unemployment was so low in the USSR, and employment so fruitful, because it was built by the workers for the workers, it was a socialist state.

How, in the face of such an overwhelming disparity, could anyone claim Capitalism can, or that Socialism cannot, solve the dreaded issue of unemployment?

Unemployment cannot end without the death of capitalism and the building of a new system superior to it in every way. We must cease putting our faith in parliamentary Etonians and start putting our faith in ourselves – we can build a system where jobs are available for all who can work and where even the lowest paid job can sustain us comfortably. It is not a case of we could – it is a case of we must.

Advertisements

Why did so many third world countries seem to support the Trump campaign?

Many people on the left are unable to explain why people from oppressed nations seemed to lend some support to Donald Trump in his election campaign. Confronted with the problem that they can’t blanket label all these governments racist, as many did to Trump supporters in America, refusing to explain Trump’s serious problems in order to fit a Clintonite liberal policy. What reasons could there be, when racism is no longer the answer, to why oppressed peoples around the world supported the Trump campaign?

When I visited Cuba I was chatting to a tour guide about politics (he was a big fan of his government and the Communist Party of Cuba), and he told me that he personally had hoped Trump would win the election, his reasoning being that Trump as a businessman might be more inclined to end the blockade, as it has a negative effect on the American economy as well as the Cuban; from a purely economic perspective it is bad for business.

Figures who no-one could accuse of having a love for America, such as Vladimir Putin, Bashar al-Assad and Robert Mugabe, and their respective governments, released statements that might seem to favour a Trump victory in the election. Even press releases from Chinese state media and the DPRKorean KCNA, prior to the election, favoured Trump.

Continue reading “Why did so many third world countries seem to support the Trump campaign?”

Salute to Red Robbo who has died today aged 90

Red Robbo

Birmingham Worker and the local branch of the CPGB-ML salute the life of Derek Robinson, aka “Red Robbo”, famous communist trade unionist who died this morning. Derek Robinson, played an important role throughout his life in defending the working conditions of Birmingham workers at British Leylands car manufacturing plant in Longbridge through a period of concerted attack on working people by Margaret Thatcher and the betrayal of numerous struggles opposed to these atatcks by the Labour party, not least the heroic Great Miners Strike of 1984.

As the Communist Party at that time continued it’s decline towards eventual liquidation, and the Soviet Union headed for collapse following the total betrayal of socialism by revionism, Derek Robinson holds a place in British working class history as a fighter for the interests of his class in exceptionally difficult circumstances. It was revealed in the years which followed Derek Robinsons dismissal from British Leyland that Mi5 had conspired with revisonists and agents within the old CPGB to work against Robinson and his comrades at Leyland who represented workers at the Longbridge plant. A hate campaign in the local media led by the reactionary Birmingham Mail (which continues it’s anti-worker activities today during the bin strike) was instrumental in undermining the solidarity of workers at the British Leyland factory who eventually were bribed and blackmailed into acquiescing in Robinson’s sacking with the connivance of “right wing” (Labour Party) union officials.

Red Salute to Derek Robinson!

(a fuller and very interesting obituary can be read on the website of labour movement historian Graham Stevenson, the leader of the revisionist “Communist Party of Britain” which still has a small branch in Birmingham)

Was the October Revolution authoritarian?

As we approach our celebrations for the centenary of the Great October Socialist Revolution we find it even more necessary than usual to deal with slander against the concept of the dictatorship of the proletariat.

Peterloo_Massacre
The Peterloo massacre, a response to a protest demanding parliamentary reform, 1819

The manipulative elements on the ‘left’, social democrats and fake revolutionaries whose task is to keep the working class from revolt, tell us that violent revolution must be renounced and that we can do things peacefully because we are, after all, a civilised society! Violent revolutions are for the ‘backwards’ peoples of the world who, they must sorely admit, after liberating themselves from colonial domination, imperialist plundering, and their own bourgeoisie, managed to lead the world in development and rights.

Youth arrested
Bloody Sunday, when British troops occupying Ireland shot dead 26 unarmed civilians, 1972

But still, the way in which they did it was unsavoury to these people, and objectively they argue for the status quo, with its inherent violence from imperialist war, poverty, starvation, preventable disease, terrible working conditions, and police brutality. Their solution is simply to wish away capitalism while the ruling class directs their entire arsenal at the workers. This is idealist nonsense that has never, and will never, liberate a single worker, let alone a nation or the whole world.

Continue reading “Was the October Revolution authoritarian?”

100th Anniversary of the October Revolution: Join us in Southall on Saturday 4th November!

On the 100th anniversary of the great Socialist October Revolution, join us to celebrate the victorious struggles of the mass working class. We will come together to celebrate this working-class revolution, which literally shook the world, and still indicates the path we must take to shatter all exploitation of man by man and nation by nation! We will be holding THE centenary celebration of this festival of progressive humanity in Southall, west London, on Saturday 4th November, at 4.30pm.

Venue: The Dominion Centre, 112 The Green, Southall UB2 4BQ

Map

Get your ticket here

Read more about the October Revolution here

At this meeting, we will bring together members and supporters from around the country and mark the continued development and growth of our organisation, while reminding ourselves of just what it is we are working towards.

Lenin and 1917: a new era

Over the years, the speakers at our meetings have examined in great detail all the most important aspects of the October Revolution. They have paid tribute to the men and women workers who carried out the revolution, and to the leading role of the Bolshevik party – the revolutionary organisation in whose footsteps we hope to follow, which enabled the workers to understand their enemy and to organise themselves to defeat it.

Importantly, in the present climate, our speakers have repeatedly stressed the vital role played by revolutionary theory – especially the immense theoretical contribution of Vladimir Ilyich Lenin, who advanced Marxist science by adding to it a precise definition of imperialism (the final stage of decaying capitalism) and who detailed the ways in which imperialism affects the struggle of workers and peasants of all countries for their liberation and social emancipation.

It was Comrade Lenin who created the template for a revolutionary party, working out in the furnace of intense class struggle the essential elements of communist organisation that enabled workers to make their efforts effective. All parties that are serious about overthrowing capitalism and building socialism still follow these organisational tenets today.

Lenin was also a master of strategy and tactics. He solved many important questions, such as the peasant question and the national question, by clearly and precisely explaining their relationship to the socialist revolution. He demonstrated the need for the proletariat to maximise its forces by galvanising as many allies for each phase of the struggle as possible, and showed how it was both possible and necessary to take on the various enemies of socialism one at a time rather than all together.

Unlike Trotsky and his modern-day followers, Lenin did not play at revolution, and was not at all interested in heroic failures. He understood that what was at stake was nothing less than the future of humanity, and he taught the working class how to think and act so it could win.

Read more!